Navigation: Michael Milutis | Home | Subscribe | About the Newsletter | Software Best Practices Events | Archives Software Best Practices Interviews About our Contributors Software Best Practices Reading List Software Best Practices Links About the Institute About the Sponsor Software Processes Software Metrics Software Estimation IT Governance Chat Live Software Best Practices Conferences - North AmericaSoftware Best Practices Conferences - EuropeSoftware Best Practices Conferences - Asia PacificSoftware Best Practices WorkshopsSoftware Best Practices Webinars
Home  -   Contact Us  -   Site Map
Computer Aid, Inc.(CAI) IT Metrics and Productivity Institute: Covering Best Practices in Software Development, Management and Maintenance

 ITMPI Now on Twitter!

 Subscribe to RSS
 What is RSS?



IFPUG: Conferences

Software Test & Performance Conference

The Software Best Practices Conferences

Implementations Workshop



Software ProcessesSoftware MetricsSoftware EstimationIT GovernanceCAI
Subscribe for Free!


Interested in sponsoring or advertising?  
Click HERE for details!  

Read our featured article from CAI: Improving Application Development Effectiveness

 
New Research in Software Metrics
 
 
Quote of the Week
"When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it is tied to everything else in the universe."
- John Muir (1838-1914)
 
 
Developers Have Opinions Too! Gauging Acceptance of Software Metrics Programs

Over the past 20 years, there has been considerable progress in the design and implementation of software quality programs, process improvement techniques, and metrics initiatives. Empirical evidence gathered on these topics has revealed that socio-political, cultural, and human factors are crucial to the metrics ecosystem as they can influence the social climate, attitudes of developers and the credibility of gathered data. The industry doesn't yet have a clear grasp on the impact of the human element and how it affects challenges like developer buy-in. A better understanding could transform our approach. The MAM framework (Metrics Acceptance Model) developed by Medha Umarji and her colleagues at the University of Maryland Baltimore County have developed a framework for predicting developer acceptance of metrics and other process improvement programs. We invite you to contribute to the evaluation of the MAM by taking the Metrics Acceptance Survey.

 
 

There is plenty of good advice available on best practices and enablers of successful measurement programs. Planners and implementers of these programs, however, continue to grapple with push back from developers. This resistance often stems from developers' distrust of the metrics process and a lack of belief that metrics will be useful, amongst other factors. To help organizations pin-point the problems they are likely to encounter in getting buy-in from their developers, we compiled a diagnostic survey that gathers opinions and attitudes directly from developers. The survey, and underlying framework, is based on problem areas identified in metrics and process acceptance literature. To evaluate the effect of these problem areas on developer motivation, we applied our survey to 98 metrics practitioners. We learned that four factors: metrics usefulness, fear of adverse consequences, expectations of managers and colleagues, and attitude towards metrics were significantly related to the motivation to collect metrics data. In this paper we present our assessment framework, the results of the survey, and the implications for planners and implementers of metrics programs. (15 pages)

 
 

In the past decades, there has been considerable progress in the design and understanding of software quality, process improvement, and metrics initiatives. However, much of the potential of such initiatives might be hindered due to social and psychological factors causing resistance. Metrics initiatives are particularly prone to such resistance. The study presented in this paper is part of a larger investigation that aims to understand the social, behavioral and cultural obstacles to getting the buy-in of developers and their project managers to software metrics programs. (10 pages)

 

 

 
  


For more information on software best practices and IT management, please contact Michael Milutis, the IT Metrics and Productivity Journal Executive Director, at michael_milutis@compaid.com